Representing Estate and Trust Beneficiaries and Fiduciaries

  • Thursday-Friday
  • July 19-20, 2007
  • Taj Boston (FKA the Ritz-Carlton Boston)
  • Boston, MA

Shipped to you: Printed Coursebook | MP3 CD-ROM | DVD Video

Available Online: | MP3 Downloads | Coursebook

What You Will Learn

This annual advanced course of study, comprising more than 12 hours of instruction, is designed for:

Corporate investment officers and relationship managers

Advisors to fiduciaries and beneficiaries

Lawyers who act as trustees

Lawyers interested in estate and trust litigation, and

Estate planning and estate and trust administration professionals

 

The course examines four areas in particular:

A survey of current fiduciary law and cases

A drill-down from generalities to numerics for the prudent investor

The unique challenges facing the lawyer-trustee

Retirement benefit issues

 

The faculty also discusses:

The current fiduciary litigation landscape

The industry standard for testing adjustments under Principal and Income Acts

The meaning of "risk tolerance" in the trust context

The probability for preserving real trust value that prudence requires

The extension of the Unfair Trade Practice Act to trustees

The receipt and release reality

The "compensated risk" that trumps diversification

Tax consequences of settlements that usually surprise

Pressures on lawyer-trustees, and

The challenge of retirement benefits payable to trusts

 

Time is reserved throughout the program to address registrants’ questions.

Back to Top

Planning Chairs

Donald P. DiCarlo, Jr., Director, Trust and Estate Planning,  Vanguard National Trust Company, The Vanguard Group, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania

Steven M. Fast, Day Pitney LLP, West Hartford, Connecticut

Robert Whitman, Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law, Hartford

Back to Top

Faculty

Grace Allison, The Northern Trust Company, Chicago

Debra J. Berns, Vice President & Senior Counsel, Benefits, CBS Corporation, New York

Dominic J. Campisi, Evans, Latham and Campisi, P.C., San Francisco

Stephen Campisi, CFA, Bank of America, Hartford, Connecticut

Natalie B. Choate, Bingham McCutchen, LLP, Boston

John H. Clymer, Nixon Peabody LLP, Boston

George L. Cushing, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, Boston

David M. English, William Franklin Fratcher Professor of Law, University of Missouri School of Law, Columbia

Mary J. Hackett, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh

Leonard H. Hersh, AllianceBernstein L.P., New York

Paula M. Jones, McCarter & English LLP, Philadelphia

Julie K. Kwon, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago

William A. Lowell, Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP, Boston

Susan Porter, United States Trust Company, N.A., New York

Susan L. Repetti, Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, Boston

Hanson S. Reynolds, Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster, Boston

Mark E. Swirbalus, Day Pitney LLP, Boston

G. Warren Whitaker, Day Pitney LLP, New York

Jeffrey C. Wolken, Wilmington Trust Company, Wilmington, Delaware

Raymond H. Young, Young & Bayle, Boston

 

ALI-ABA Staff Attorney: William S. Stevens, Assistant Director, Office of Courses of Study

Back to Top

Program Schedule

Times listed are Eastern Time

THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2007

8:30 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast

9:00 a.m. Introductory Remarks

9:05 a.m. Fiduciary Litigation Update: Survey of Current Law Mr. Dominic Campisi

10:45 a.m. Networking Break

11:00 a.m. New Rubric of Risk: Unfair Trade PracticesMr. Swirbalus

11:30 a.m. Prudent Investment in an Uncertain WorldMr. Hersh

12:00 noon Lunch Break

1:30 p.m. Diversification vs. Compensated RiskMr. Wolken

2:00 p.m. Emerging Issues under the Prudent Investor and Principal and Income ActsMs. Porter

2:45 p.m. Networking Break

3:00 p.m. Prudence: From Fuzzy to PreciseMessrs. Stephen Campisi and Fast 

Defining the Payout Required by the P&I Act: Is It "What Income Would Have Been with 50% Invested for Income Beneficiaries Only and 50% for Remainder Beneficiaries Only"? 

Defining the Prudent Investment Objective: Is It "The Maximum Return Consistent with Distribution of the P&I Payout and Preservation of True Principal Value"? 

Defining the Probability for Achieving the Investment Objective Required by Prudence: Is It "At Least an 80% Probability of Preserving 75% of True Principal Value"?

3:30 p.m. Prudence: Getting on the Same Page with Its Numeric MeaningMr. DiCarlo, Moderator; Ms. Porter; and Messrs. Stephen Campisi, Fast, Hersh, and Wolken

4:00 p.m. Dealing with Power of Attorney Problems and Retirement BenefitsMs. Berns

4:15 p.m. When Retirement Benefits Are Payable to a TrustMs. Choate

5:15 p.m. Comments and Questions

5:30 p.m. Adjournment for the Day

 

FRIDAY, JULY 20, 2007

8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast

9:00 a.m. Fiduciary Litigation Update: Survey of Current Law (continued)Mr. Dominic Campisi

10:30 a.m. Networking Break

10:45 a.m. Trust Situs: When Is There a Duty To Move? – Mr. Cushing

11:15 a.m. Sorting Out Receipts and Releases – Professor Whitman

11:45 a.m. Comments and Questions

12:00 noon Lunch Break

1:30 p.m. Issues for the "Lawyer-Trustee" – Professor English, Moderator; Mss. Jones and Repetti; and Messrs. Clymer, Lowell, Reynolds, and Young
 
Is There an "Incidental" Securities Law Problem? Is the Prudent Investor Act or UTC an Issue? How Do You Explain the Effect on Exculpatory Provisions? Is There a Conflict with the Duty of Loyalty to Your Partners? How Much of an Investment Expert Do You Need To Be?

2:45 p.m. Networking Break

3:00 p.m. Foreign Assets, Foreign Trusts – Mr. Whitaker 

3:30 p.m. Settlements: Oh, the Difference a Tax Makes! – Ms. Kwon

4:00 p.m. Delegation and Investment in Affiliated Funds – Ms. Hackett

4:30 p.m. New Compliance Concerns for the Charitable Trust Plan – Ms. Allison

5:00 p.m. Comments and Questions

 5:15 p.m. Adjournment

 

Total 60-minute hours of instruction: 12.75

Back to Top

Here's what registrants have said about this course:

This course keeps me informed of potential litigation issues in the trust business and provides guidance that our business model is operating in a sound fashion.

Faculty was outstanding. Program was well organized, and materials very helpful.

The course was very informative. The faculty are well versed on their topics and interact well.

This seminar is excellent. I have been attending annually for five years. This year was the best because of more time spent to discuss practical litigation issues.

Back to Top

 

 

Course Details

Real-Time Customer Service