Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc: Data Mining and Regulation - Where Do We Go From Here?
Why Attend?
Did the decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. et al (June 23, 2011) put an end to government regulation of the data mining industry? What is the future of the regulation of commercial "speech" and the Central Hudson test? Get a clear view of this case—an important look data mining, privacy and de-identification, and commercial speech —including what it decided and what it is has left open to interpretation. Our faculty will also discuss what the expected implications of this major ruling will be.
What You Will Learn
The implications of Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. et al
New or remaining grounds for regulation of data mining
Impact on the future of commercial speech regulation and the Central Hudson test
Who Should Attend
Trial Lawyers
In-House Counsel
General Counsel
Business Lawyers
Health Lawyers
Planning Chair
Marc Rotenberg, Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center and President, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, D.C.
Faculty
Bridget C. Asay, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Montpelier, Vermont
Ms. Asay represented Petitioners William H. Sorrell et al in Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. et al. She directs the civil appellate practice for the Vermont Attorney General’s Office. She also chairs the Vermont Board of Bar Examiners and serves on the Vermont Bar Association’s Roundtable on the Profession.
Thomas C. Goldstein, Partner, Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C., Bethesda, Maryland
Mr. Goldstein represented Respondent IMS Health, Inc. in in Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. et al.
Irv Gornstein, Visiting Professor of Law; Executive Director, Supreme Court Institute, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C.
Robert J. Katerberg, Arnold & Porter LLP , Washington, D.C.
Mr. Katerberg assisted in the representation of Respondent Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. et al.
For group tuition discounts, click on the Registration link at top and register online at the discounted rates, or go to the Group Webcast Page or email groupregistration@ali-aba.org for assistance
Program Schedule
All Times Eastern
1:30 pm Sorrell v. IMS Health,Inc.: Data Mining and Regulation – Where Do We Go From Here?
--Panel discussion
--Audience Questions
2:45 pm Adjournment
This audio program comes to you live on Tuesday, July 21, 2011, 1:30-2:45 pm EDT, via your phone or your computer (your choice). You will be able to email questions to the panel during the program (see below). Materials corresponding to the course may be downloaded or viewed online, though they may not necessarily be followed precisely by the faculty during the program.
• Email your questions before or during the program to tsquestions@ali-aba.org.
Total 60-minute hours of instruction: 1.25; Total 50-minute hours 1.5
Suggested Prerequisite: Some familiarity with privacy law and regulation of commercial speech.
Educational Objective: Understanding of the outcome and implications of the Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. Supreme Court decision.
Level of Instruction: Intermediate
Times
Eastern 1:30 pm to 2:45 pm Central 12:30 pm to 1:45 pm Mountain 11:30 am to 12:45 pm Pacific & Arizona 10:30 am to 11:45 am Alaska 9:30 am to 8:45 am Hawaii 7:30 am to 8:45 am
